Latinas are closer, why go to the FSU? from another thread

[2tallbill]

I always thought it makes more sense for US men to go for Latinas unless really opposed or into FSW in a big way, it's right on their doorstep.

[2tallbill]

Plus Trench I thought You sometimes watched 90 day Fiancee Basically ALL latina women who marry American in that show are extremely bossy, jealous, posessive and have an anger managment problem.

This could make an excellent thread. I went to the FSU because
1. Love gray, blue or green eyed girls
2. I love long legs and a slim body.
3. I love a smart AND educated girl
4. I want a girl who can knows how to find New Zealand on a globe
5. I am way too tall for a girl less than 165 CM. We don't fit together. 
 
There is no shortage of cRaZy girls in the FSU. There is no shortage of terrible
girls in the FSU. There are girls who can sing like a choir of angels and there are girls
who can make the neighbors dog cry like their tail was caught in the car door. There
are girls who can cook and bake anything under the sun and there are girls who can
set off the smoke alarm making a pot of tea. There are girls who can do advanced
calculus in their head and there are girl who take off their shoes when the count
higher than ten.

The FSU has a huge surplus of unmarried women the age of 35-40 who would love
to have a marriage and family. The men there often treat them like old milk.   

The FSU has everything, good AND bad. I went there to sort out the bad, to find
my nugget of gold among the tons of gravel. It took me 9 years because I ONLY
wanted solid gold. It's not for anyone who can't dump a hot girl. It's not for the
indecisive or the tentative, or for the easily distracted, or for those who don't
have basic social skills or who can't read social cues or for the paranoid or
for those who fear the unknown. 

How can you find a girl who LOVES you if you can't tell the differences between
her words and what her eyes say?

[2tallbill]

Plus Trench I thought You sometimes watched 90 day Fiancee Basically ALL latina women who marry American in that show are extremely bossy, jealous, posessive and have an anger managment problem.

Once my friends and I were watching an episode where an american guy married to one of those latina women (very hot though)
and he was telling other guys how he never wanted to marry an AW because those would complain not be appriciative etc etc.
Well the joke is on him because his Latina wife complains all the time, doesn't like houses he provides for her, is against
having a second baby and so on.
So I guess I have sort of developed a stereotype form watching that show
I didn't tell any of this to Dan though, it's HIS taste

But if You want I can post really funny clips

PS Mexican's president last name is Sheinbaum it's a very Ashkenazi Jewish last name!

None of those shows would put on a normal man finding a normal woman.
ML and Mrs ML no way. They would only put him on a show if he was pursuing
a 20 something can of worms girl. Mrs. ML has a PHD in advanced XYZ* Mathematics,
She wakes up happy.

My wife has a degree in electrical engineering, she worked for a company that built
nuclear power plants around the world.

All of these shows highlight vast differences between the Western men and the
Non-Western women. ALL the men love their wives far, far more than the wives
love them. That is a recipe for disaster itself.

If men can learn ONE thing. Don't marry any woman who doesn't love you as
much as you love her. My wife has more love in her pinky toe than I have in my entire
body. She loves, loves, loves, loves me. I really, really love her,  I do. It doesn't mean
that I don't p!ss her off or get on her nerves because sometimes I do.

I would never offer to expose my private life, wife or family to the type of scrutiny that
a reality TV show does. My wife would never intentionally say or do anything to publicly in 
demean or embarrass me. I would never do it either. We clearly defined our roles in most
things before we got married. We decide what we are going to do then we go out and do
it. My wife and I are ALWAYS on the same side.

I would punch one of the instigating producers in the nose, then she would stab them in
the eye with a fork. A functional marriage is not what those yahoos want to put on TV.
To say that all Latina's are even remotely like the girls on a reality show is for sure not
accurate.

*XYZ mathematics is something that I don't know WTF it is.

[2tallbill]

I always thought it makes more sense for US men to go for Latinas unless really opposed or into FSW in a big way, it's right on their doorstep.

You tend to look at everything through a lens of time, effort and money. You want to skip steps
that should absolutely not be skipped because it requires effort. You want to spend less days
visiting a girl because it cost more to spend ten days with her than it costs if you spend 3 days.
You think that style is better than substance. In the short term, style might work better, but
with marriage and happiness ONLY substance matters.

You can't deceive FSU girls long term, yet that is exactly what you propose to do in nearly every
silly thread you post.

I had a previous marriage, I was unhappy for many years. I decided that I would find as close to what
I wanted. I wasn't going to let time, effort or money keep me from that. I wasn't going to compromise
or marry a pretty good girl. I wanted an EXCELLENT girl. Shortie girls have always liked me. I have
no idea how many I've had sex with, it was plenty AND it was fun but, I did not want every sexual
experience for the rest of my life with a shortie girl.

Angel Eyes is only 172 she is nearly perfect in everything besides height.   

[olgac]

Well yes everyone knows these shows like to have scandalous couples to raise their ratings, but it's not true the difference
in age is always huge. For all Russian and Ukrainian women on that show except one the difference is maybe 3-5 years, and the marriages are fairly normal.

I agree that I shouldn't make judgement on Latina women based on this show or even based on Latinas who marry westerners. A very small percentage of woman in any country wants to marry outside the culture anyways!
I mean if I made a judgments on FSU women who marry Americans I would have come to conclusion that 75% of them divorce their American husbands! And trust me when I say I have met my fair share of FSUW married to westerners
who have been rejected by FSU men for a reason! I can elaborate more on this, but it is much easier for a man
from the same culture to see right through a woman's game.

Question though: how DO you tell if the woman really loves You and how were You able to reject hot women who
are not really into You? What were the red flags? You seem to have a pretty good understanding of people it seems.

[krimster2]

i'm a skeptic about love
marriage is a social and legal contract between two parties
violate the terms of the contract, and see how much love ya got

[ML]

Angel Eyes is only 172 she is nearly perfect in everything besides height.

My wife is 170 cm (around 5' 6.5") which is good match height wise for my 6 foot (and shrinking) height.  We look pretty good together (height wise), as several have commented, with her in or out of heels.

[ML]

Quote from: 2tallbill on Today at 12:18:47 PM

    *XYZ mathematics is something that I don't know WTF it is.


In my wife's case:  XYZ is Dynamical Systems which is a step above Differential Equations.

It is being increasingly used to address genetic, biological, chemical and medical problems.  Big topics now are projecting how Covid and other such will mutate.

Very simple to understand also as briefed below:

Dynamical system models of complex biochemical reaction networks are usually high-dimensional, nonlinear, and contain many unknown parameters. In some cases the reaction network structure dictates that positive equilibria must be unique for all values of the parameters in the model. In other cases multiple equilibria exist if and only if special relationships between these parameters are satisfied. We describe methods based on homotopy invariance of degree which allow us to determine the number of equilibria for complex biochemical reaction networks and how this number depends on parameters in the model.

Feinberg [1979] sought to explain “at least in an informal way, how chemists and chemical engineers arrive at the differential equations they work with and how these differential equations are tied to reaction network structure.  Once this is done we can begin to understand why a reasonably general theory of chemical reaction networks is necessary.”

Soulé [2004] provided another approach to the question of multistationarity by outlining some graphic requirements. “The signs of the entries of the Jacobian matrix of F at a given point a define an interaction graph, i.e. a finite oriented finite graph G(a) where each edge is equipped with a sign. René Thomas conjectured 20 years ago that if F has at least two nondegenerate zeroes, there exists a such that G(a) contains a positive circuit. Different authors proved this in special cases, and we give here a general proof of the conjecture. In particular, in this way we get a necessary condition for genetic networks to lead to multistationarity, and therefore to differentiation.”

A positive-feedback-based bistable ‘memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision is demonstrated by Xiong and Ferrell [2003].  They show that the “ . . . system normally generates an irreversible biochemical response from a transient stimulus, but the response becomes transient when positive feedback is blocked. Our results explain how a group of intrinsically reversible signal transducers can generate an irreversible response at a systems level, and show how a cell fate can be maintained by a self-sustaining pattern of protein kinase activation.”
- - - - - - - -
Craciun and Feinberg [2005, 2006] focused on multiple equilibria in complex chemical reaction networks.  The first paper dealt with the injectivity property. “We suggest a new method for discriminating between networks that have the capacity for multiple equilibria and those that do not.”
The second paper made use of the species-reaction graph and addressed some connections to biology.  “In particular, we associate with each network a species-reaction graph, which is similar to reaction network representations drawn by biochemists, and we show that, if the graph satisfies certain weak conditions, the differential equations corresponding to the network cannot admit multiple equilibria.”
- - - - - - - -
Understanding bistability in complex enzyme-driven reaction networks was the subject of a paper by Craciun et al. [2006].  Bistability is an important feature in biochemical reaction networks and has some relevance for medical procedures such as cancer treatments. “Even at the most basic levels of cell operation, there is evidence, both theoretical and experimental, that important metabolic pathways have the capacity to exhibit bistability, i.e., to exhibit two very different stable steady states, with switching between them driven by response to chemical signaling. We present a theorem that distinguishes between those mass action networks that might support bistable behavior and those that cannot.”
- - - - - - - -
Alon [2007] described “Transcription regulation networks control the expression of genes. The transcription networks of well-studied microorganisms appear to be made up of a small set of recurring regulation patterns, called network motifs. The same network motifs have recently been found in diverse organisms from bacteria to humans, suggesting that they serve as basic building blocks of transcription networks, including signaling and neuronal networks.”

- - - - - -

Note:  These are only the words.  When you look at the equations involved . . . your stomach might get quite queasy like mine does.

I have to read all that my wife types up to check on the English . . . but I can't avoid seeing the dreaded math also !!  :-(

[ML]

Bill:  Thank you for your explanation.

I did Differential Equations when I took Calculus. XYZ covers my understanding of it, especially now that I forgot 100% of what I learned back in the olden days.

Olga: Same here. I was really good in Math while in college and now I hardly remember anything. Can't even help my daughter with her more advanced math classes in college! Only computer science!

- - - - -

OK, for those who don't have weak stomachs . . . I attach just a couple of partial pages of one work my wife wrote up.  If anyone sees a math error, let me know and I will tell wife.

And let me note the benefit of having a wife that is an expert in Dynamical Systems.  She is great in the bed!

[ML]

Krimster:  "great in bed"

cuz she can calculate the moment of inertia on yur counter-rotation on her sugar plum?
does quantifying it help?
I'm a skeptic

- - - - - -

Never got into trying to quantify it.
Just enjoy . . . the quality.

[2tallbill]

Question though: how DO you tell if the woman really loves You and how were You able to reject hot
women whoare not really into You? What were the red flags? You seem to have a pretty good
understanding of people it seems.

I am a salesman. I ask probing open ended questions to determine what somebody wants and what is
important to them. People will not always tell you immediately what they want, so you need to probe
until you are sure what they want. The secret to success in sales is to help the most people get what
they want.

You read verbal and nonverbal cues. Let's move to girls rather than sales (they are totally related).
Are they leaning towards you are they focused, looking into your eyes? what are they doing with
their hands. What do they do when you lean in towards them?

Many men will ignore that they lean back a little bit, because they want to believe the girl is into
them because they didn't leave so far. A romantically interested FSUW will try to anticipate what
you want. A hot girl who is only so-so interested will not. I have many Russian friends, EVERY ONE
OF THEM told me unsolicited that Angel Eyes is a good girl, and that she is smart. Her eyes lit up
when she saw me.

Talk to her how does she answer? I told her once early on that she was going to fall in love with me
and then we would get married and live happily ever after. Then she said matter of fact "I know"

Once you find a girl that for any reason is not your future wife, you tell her that you do not want
her to delay one more second of her life with you, that her future happiness can only start when
she is free of you. Wish her love, health, romance and happiness. Then get the hell out of there.
DO NOT HAVE SEX WITH HER! That is sending her bad signals and screwing with her head. Don't
be an @ss! Leave the poor girl alone and move on. Do not contact her down the road, leave her
alone.

[ML]

A romantically interested FSUW will try to anticipate what
you want. A hot girl who is only so-so interested will not.

Her eyes lit up when she saw me.

Similar story regarding my now wife.

Early in our relationship, I called her to tell that I was unexpectedly free and asked if she could meet me at a central spot in town.

I was outside the place and when I saw her approaching, I stepped behind a tree and watched her.

She was walking briskly, all bright eyed with a look of excitement on her face as she approached the door.  She stepped inside the glass enclosed entry and looked around with an almost panicked look on her face when she couldn't find me.

I quickly entered because I didn't mean to cause undue stress on her; and she hugged me tightly.

Now compare her pace, eyes, face, excitement and panic . . . with the eyes, face, lack of excitement and lack of panic from a  woman who had minimal or no attraction toward me.

[2tallbill]

Similar story regarding my now wife.

You've found solid gold, that's what everyone should aspire to.